I posted earlier about my need to return to drawing basics. After studying a lot of books and learning rudimentary anatomy, I see and feel the need to review some areas.
Initially, I intended to review the Andrew Loomis books, Burne Hogarth books and the Famous Artists courses. I started with Loomis's "Fun With a Pencil" but still felt that I wasn't getting what I needed.
Then I remembered John K's Animation School. Five years ago I rushed through his lessons and I doubt I got the full benefit. I'm returning to his lessons because I'm convinced that they're the one thing I need at this time to improve my cartooning and animation. Also, I completely agree with John K.'s position that Golden Age animation and cartooning was extremely superior to today's.
I grew up in the 1970's and fell in love with animation that looked like this:
Initially, I intended to review the Andrew Loomis books, Burne Hogarth books and the Famous Artists courses. I started with Loomis's "Fun With a Pencil" but still felt that I wasn't getting what I needed.
Then I remembered John K's Animation School. Five years ago I rushed through his lessons and I doubt I got the full benefit. I'm returning to his lessons because I'm convinced that they're the one thing I need at this time to improve my cartooning and animation. Also, I completely agree with John K.'s position that Golden Age animation and cartooning was extremely superior to today's.
I grew up in the 1970's and fell in love with animation that looked like this:
I didn't know at the time why it appealed so much to me—emphasis on the word APPEAL, a topic John K. covers on his blog—but I knew that I believed that Bugs Bunny and Tom and Jerry were REAL.
It turns out that the reason I believed they were real is because of their CONSTRUCTION. All of those characters from the 40's and 50's were drawn round and solid.
How are cartoons from the 1960's to today made? Flat and angular. For example:
I acknowledge that my skills are not even close to the person/people who drew the above or anyone else working in the animation industry today. I'm simply pointing out an aesthetic difference between the cartoons that made me fall madly in love with animation and the cartoons today which I find unpleasant and find impossible to watch (i.e., Family Guy). And I think John K. would agree with me that the characters above are missing some animation fundamentals that were often present in Golden Age animation. In the characters above from the series The Awesomes, I don't see dynamic lines of action; solid, 3-dimensional drawing to give weight; large eyes to allow for expressiveness; and overall appeal.
I did some quick research and discovered that almost ALL American tv animation looks like this, flat and angular. Completely absent are roundness and solidity.
And that's exactly why I'm going to work hard to draw the "old-fashioned" way. Not only do I think it looks infinitely better, but it will be a way to distinguish my work from all the others.
If you want to improve your cartooning and animation skills, I HIGHLY recommend that you click the link above for John K.'s Animation School. I'm convinced that if you follow his lessons carefully, your work will reach the next level in a short period.